A civil revision petition under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent) Control Act was dismissed as withdrawn upon filing of a withdrawal memo by the petitioner's counsel.
Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.01.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
C.R.P.(NPD).No.3400 of 2013
S.Sivakumar .. Petitioner ..Vs.. Pokali Radhakrishnan Chetty (now Usha Traders)
rep. by Proprietor P.Vijayakumar .. Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent) Control Act As Amended against the order and decreetal order dated 14.03.2013 in RCA.No.1258 of 2005 by the Appellate Authority, VII Small Causes Court, Chennai confirming the orders in RCOP.No.401 of 2005 by the learned Rent Controller, XVI Small Causes Court, Chennai dated 18.10.2005.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.J.Parthasarathy For Respondent : Mr.C.Rajasekar
2
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
nl O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo dated 28.01.2019 before this Court seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this Revision.
To
C.R.P.(NPD).No.3400 of 2013
S. Sivakumar
Pokali Radhakrishnan Chetty (now Usha Traders)
Abdul Qudoose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
