Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226/227 against dismissal orders in tenant eviction suits. The Court held that since the tenant had already vacated the premises, the petition became infructuous. Consequently, the petition was dismissed with no costs awarded.
Petition dismissed as infructuous with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.03.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISHKUMAR
C.R.P.No.3305 of 2009
R.Srinivasan .... Petitioner Vs 1.V.Nagasubramanian 2.V.Jayaraman .... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the dismissal order dated 23.01.2009 passed in R.C.A.No.483 of 2007 on the file of the VIII Court of Small Causes at Madras, confirming the order of dismissal dated 21.02.2007 passed in R.C.O.P.No.1446 of 2006 on the file of the XIII Court of Small Causes at Madras.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.B.Ramanujam For Respondents : No appearance
O R D E R
When the matter is called today, the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the tenant has already vacated the premises and nothing survives in this petition.
2.In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar ay
To
C.R.P.No.3305 of 2009
SJ(CO) GN(25/04/2019)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R. Srinivasan
V. Nagasubramanian
V. Jayaraman
N. Sathishkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
