Partly allowed

M.Selvaraj v. M.Anandharaj

Madras HC18 Feb 2019CRP/3210/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of a Civil Revision Petition challenging the dismissal of an application to reject a plaint due to under-valuation. The Court held that under Section 12 of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, the court must first decide the valuation issue before jurisdiction, and remitted the matter back for fixation of correct value.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners appeals dismissed; matter remitted to learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate to consider valuation and fix correct value if under-valued.

M.Selvaraj Vs M.Anandharaj — Property and Title | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 18.02.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA

¶5

C.R.P.No.3210 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.18358 of 2018

¶6

M. Selvaraj ... Petitioner/2^nd Petitioner/ 2^nd Defendant Vs 1.M.Anandharaj ...Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff 2.M.Kayalvizhi 3.M.Sivaraman 4.M.Malarvizhi 5.M.Asalambal ... Respondents/Petitioners/ Defendants 1,3,4 & 5 PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and final order of the learned District Munsif -cumJudicial Magistrate, Kattumannarkoil, dated 12.06.2018 in I.A.No.107 of 2016 in O.S.No.87 of 2015. For Petitioner : Mr.T. Gowthaman For Respondents : Mr.P. Rathinavelu for R1 Mr.N. Vijayakumar for R2 to R5 ORDER

¶7

The above Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated 12.06.2018 in I.A.No.107 of 2016 in O.S.No.87 of 2015 in and by which the learned District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate, Kattumannarkoil, has dismissed the application filed by the revision petitioner/defendant for rejecting the Plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure on the ground that the suit property is undervalued and that the Court lacks the pecuniary jurisdiction to take up the suit.

¶8

2.Without going into the merits of this case, it would suffice that under Section 12 of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, the Court has to mandatorily first consider and decide the issue as to whether the suit has been properly valued and proper fee has been paid on the same.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

3.In addition to that, the provisions of Order VII Rule 11

¶11

of the Code of Civil Procedure reads as follows:

¶12

“(b).Where the relief claimed is under-valued, and the plaintiff, on being required by the Court to so correct the valuation within a time to be fixed by the Court, fails to do so;

¶13

(c)Where the relief claimed is properly valued, but the plaint is written upon paper insufficiently stamped, and the plaintiff, on being required by the Court to supply the requisite stamp-paper within a time to be fixed by the Court, fails to do so;”

¶14

4.Considering the above provisions and ends of justice, the matter is remitted back to the learned District Munsif -cumJudicial Magistrate, Kattumannarkoil, to consider whether the suit has been properly valued and in the event of the suit has been under-valued, the correct value has to be fixed and the suit to be transferred to the appropriate Court granting time to the plaintiff to make good the difference in Court Fees.

¶15

This Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mps To

¶16

The District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate, Kattumannarkoil.

¶17

+1CC to Mr.T.Gowthaman, Advocate Sr.15039 +1cc to Mr.P.Rathinavel, Advocate Sr.14293

¶18

C.R.P.No.3210 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.18358 of 2018

¶19

vba[co] srg 24/04/2019

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Selvaraj v. M.Anandharaj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Selvaraj v. M.Anandharaj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

L.S.Raja Vs Diocese of Vellore Society

Sivaprakash Vs K.K.Natchimuthugounder

Devi Palanisamy Vs Sankar

M. Sowkath Ara Vs M. Mohammed Nazeer

Gopaiya Palanimuthu Vs Helanpaul

Sri Selvanayaki Bharatgas Agencies, Vs Tiruppur Tk Consumers Welfare Council