The Madras High Court dismissed a pending Civil Revision Petition from 2008 for non-prosecution, noting the petitioner failed to serve notice to the respondent, followed by dismissal of a connected civil miscellaneous petition.
Dismissal of the revision petition for non-prosecution and closing of the connected civil miscellaneous petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.04.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
CRP NPD No.3173 of 2008 and
M.P.No.1 of 2008
R.Balasubramaniam ... Petitioner
Vs.
S.Ramasamy ... Respondent
Prayer : Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of
Civil Procedure against the order dated 29.07.2008 passed in
E.P.R.o.31 of 2008 in O.S.No.228 of 2004 by the District Munsif,
Gobichettipalayam.
For Revision Petitioner : Mr. P.Valliappan
2
N.SATHISH KUMAR. J., mst
O R D E R
This revision petition is pending from the year 2008. However, the revision petitioner has not taken steps to serve notice to the respondent, which shows that the revision petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the revision. Hence, the revision petition is
dismissed for non prosecution. The connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
05.04.2019
mst Index : yes/no Internet : yes/no Speaking order/non-speaking order To
CRP NPD No.3173 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to proceed with a long-pending revision petition lacking notice service.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Balasubramaniam
S.Ramasamy
N.Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
