M.Suresh v. B.Shanmuga Priya
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner in a civil revision petition failed to appear. The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution and closed the connected miscellaneous petition without costs.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
CRP(PD)No.3075 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.08.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
CRP(PD)No.3075 of 2014
and M.P.No.1 of 2014
M.Suresh ... Petitioner
Vs
B.Shanmuga Priya ... Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of
India, against the order and decretal order in I.A.No.2755 of 2013 in
OP.No.4213 of 2011 dt. 15.07.2014 on the file of the Hon'ble IIIrd
Additional Family Court at Chennai dismissing the same.
For Petitioner : No appearance
ORDER
The matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal” today. There is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Even on the last hearing on 17.07.2019 as well as on 24.07.2019, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. It can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this revision petition.
1/2
CRP(PD)No.3075 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Suresh
- respondent
B.Shanmuga Priya
Coram
Abdul Quddose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court