Vimal Kumar v. Azhagiamanavalan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code as infructuous, citing a subsequent order rendering the relief sought unworkable.
The Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code as infructuous, citing a subsequent order rendering the relief sought unworkable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.02.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
C.R.P(NPD).No.2391 of 2014
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of C.P.C.
against the fair and decreetal order dated 05.12.2013 in I.A.No.620 of 2011 in O.S.No.85 of 2009 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Panruti.
For Petitioners : Mr.T.Sezhian
For Respondent : No Appearance
2
C.SARAVANAN, J.,
ssn
O R D E R
In view of the order passed in C.R.P.NPD.No.1476 of 2014, the relief sought for in this Revision Petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this
Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
27.02.2019
ssn
To
The Subordinate Court,
Panruti.
C.R.P(NPD).No.2391 of 2014
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vimal Kumar
Vinothkumar
Ambika
Bakiavathy
Minor Punitha
Minor Pooja
C.Saravanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court