Nallappan v. M.Palanisamy
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Madras dismissed a Civil Revision petition as infructuous, consequently closing connected miscellaneous petitions, without detailed reasoning.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision petition dismissed; costs to petitioner not awarded; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.02.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2345 of 2014
and
M.P.No.1 of 2014
Nallappan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.M.Palanisamy
2.Thangammal
3.P.Sounder
4.P.Rangasamy
5.Rajendran
6.Raja ... Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision petition is filed under Section 115 of the CPC,
against the Fair and Decreetal order dated 20.02.2014 dismissing the
application in I.A.No.39 of 2013 in A.S.No.9 of 2012 on the file of the
Subordinate Court, Sankari.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Jagadeesan
For R2 : Mr.N.Manokaran
O R D E R
PRAYER: Civil Revision petition is filed under Section 115 of the CPC, against the Fair and Decreetal order dated 20.02.2014 dismissing the application in I.A.No.39 of 2013 in A.S.No.9 of 2012 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Sankari.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the present Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nallappan
- respondent
Palanisamy
- respondent
Thangammal
- respondent
Sounder
- respondent
Rangasamy
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court