Amudha v. M.Radhakrishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
Four Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution against Motor Accident Claims Tribunal orders were dismissed as the petitioners did not appear in court for hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.03.2019
CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISHKUMAR C.R.P.Nos.2059 to 2062 of 2009 Amudha ... Petitioner in C.R.P.No.2059 of 2009 Thangaiyan ... Petitioner in C.R.P.No.2060 of 2009 Vasantha ... Petitioner in C.R.P.No.2061 of 2009 Selvam ... Petitioner in C.R.P.No.2062 of 2009 Vs 1.M.Radhakrishnan 2.The Branch Manager, United Indian Insurance Company Limited, 123-A, Taj Tower, No.2 Road, Mayiladuthurai, Nagapattinam District. .... Respondents in all the petitions. COMMON PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the orders made in I.A.No.293 of 2009 in M.C.O.P.No.200 of 2005 dated 22.04.2009 and in I.A.Nos.295, 296, 297 of 2009 in M.C.O.P.No.198 of 2005 dated 20.04.2009 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (Additional Sub Court), Myladuthurai. For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance C O M M O N O R D E R
When the matter is called today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners as well as the respondents in all the petitions.
2.Hence, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
ay
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Amudha
- petitioner
Thangaiyan
- petitioner
Vasantha
- petitioner
Selvam
- respondent
1.M. Radhakrishnan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court