This court dismissed a civil revision petition filed against a preliminary decree in a partition suit. Absent the petitioner, the court held that since the applicant purchased pending property and the trial court's reasons were well-considered, no interference was warranted.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed; no costs; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2057 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.12.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2057 of 2014
and
MP.No.1 of 2014
S.Selvi ... Petitioner
vs.
1.Taslim Fathima
2.Minor Syed Raziq Pervez
3.Minor Faizal Parveen
4.Minor Syed Arshad Pervez
5.Minor Jaffa Sadiq
(Minor respondents 2 to 5 by
guardian mother 1 st respondent)
6.Rameeza Bivi
7.J.S.Jacob Chelliah
8.Selvaraj ...Respondents
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India
against the fair and decreetal order dated 28.01.2014 dismissing
1/3
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2057 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
unnumbered I.A. of 2013 (19R Register No.4852/2013) in I.A.No.80 of 2013 in O.S.No.92 of 2008 on the file of the learned I Additional Sub Court, Cuddalore.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondents : Mr.K.Moorthy - R1, R2, R4 & R5
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner is
absent. Heard, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 3. Since
the petitioner has purchased a property pending suit and a preliminary
decree has been passed in the partition suit, the reasons assigned by the
trial Court is well considered on merits, does not call for any interference.
2. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
10.12.2019
mtl
Index: Yes/No
2/3
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2057 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
Speaking/non-speaking order
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN.J,
mtl
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2057 of 2014
and
MP.No.1 of 2014
10.12.2019
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether interference under Article 226 was called for in dismissing the civil revision petition where the trial court's reasons were well considered on merits.
S.Selvi
Taslim Fathima
Minor Syed Raziq Pervez
Minor Faizal Parveen
Minor Syed Arshad Pervez
Minor Jaffa Sadiq
RMT TEEKAA RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
