Senthil Kumar v. Meerabai
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition seeking withdrawal of proceedings. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition, which was noted, and the matter was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS
DATED: 21.01.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
C.R.P. (PD) No. 1575 of 2016
and
C.M.P. No. 8473 of 2016
Senthil Kumar ...Petitioner
Vs
1. Meerabai
2. Vanitha
3. Sujatha
4. Rekha
5. Rajeswari
6. Vijayakumari ...Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to struck off the plaint in O.S.No.34 of 2010 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Madurantagam.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Ram Prabhu for Mr.S.Kumaresan For Respondents : Mr.N.Nagusah for R1 No Appearance for R2 to R6
2
M.S.RAMESH.,J
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Senthil Kumar
- respondent
Meerabai
- respondent
Vanitha
- respondent
Sujatha
- respondent
Rekha
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court