Radha v. G.Palaniappan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Madras dismissed a civil revision petition as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the underlying appeal had already been disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(NPD) No.1546 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.10.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN
Civil Revision Petition (NPD) No.1546 of 2014
and
M.P.No.1 of 2014
Radha Petitioner
Vs
1. G.Palaniapan
2. Gengammal
3. B.Dinesh Kumar
4. B.Praveen Kumar Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution
of India to set aside the order dated 10.01.2014 in I.A.No.83 of 2012 in
A.S.No.1 of 2012, on the file of Subordinate Court, Bhavani, Erode
District.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.S.Harsha Prabhu For Respondents : For R 1 - Ms.D.Sathya for Mrs.Zeenath Begum For R2 to R4 – Not ready in notice
O R D E R
The Civil Revision Petition has been preferred against the order dated 10.01.2014 passed in I.A.No.83 of 2012 in A.S.No.1 of 2012,
1/3
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Radha
- respondent
G.Palaniapan
- respondent
Gengammal
- respondent
B.Dinesh Kumar
- respondent
B.Praveen Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court