K.Kuppan v. R.Ulaganathan
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution was dismissed as not pressed due to the petitioners' counsel's endorsement. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as not pressed. No costs incurred.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13.08.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
CRP(PD).No.1457 of 2013
and
M.P.No.1 of 2013
1.K.Kuppan
2.M.Durai ... Petitioners
vs.
R.Ulaganathan ... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 30.01.2013 in Tr.O.P.No.47 of 2011 on the file of the District Court, Tiruvannamalai.
For Petitioners : Mr.R.Agilesh For Respondent : No appearance
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners did not
press this petition and also made an endorsement to that e f fect.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Kuppan
- petitioner
M. Durai
- respondent
R. Ulaganathan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court