N.Senthilnathan v. N.Rajendran
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the CPC as the matter became infructuous by the petitioner's endorsement.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.03.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1444 of 2014
and
M.P.No.1 of 2014
N.Senthilnathan ... Petitioner
Vs.
N.Rajendran ... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision petition is filed under Section 115 of CPC, to set aside the Fair and Decreetal order in I.A.No.70 of 2014 in O.S.No.89 of 2012 dated 25.03.2014 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Puducherry.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Gnanamoorthy for Mr.N.Suresh For Respondent : Mr.V.Balamurugan
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing the learned counsel for
the petitioner submitted that the case has became infructous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N.Senthilnathan
- respondent
N.Rajendran
Coram
C.Saravanan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court