Civil revision petition dismissed as infructuous because the underlying dispute between the parties had settled out of court.
Present Civil revision petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.03.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
C.R.P.(NPD).Nos.1298 of 2014
1.P.Nandakumari
2.P.Kasturi
3.P.Selva Kumar
4.P.Sundar
5.P.Ramesh ... Petitioners
Vs
C.Vijayakumar ... Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision petition is filed under Section 25 of the Tamilnadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act as Amended By Act 23 of 1973 & Act 1 of 1980, to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 22.11.2013 passed in R.C.A.No.85 of 2010 passed by the learned VII Judge (Rent Control Appellate Authority) Court of Small Causes Chennai, filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 17.12.2009 passed by the learned XII Judge Court of Small Causes Madras (Rend Controller) in R.C.O.No.474 of 2008.
For Petitioners : Mr.N.Gomathi For Respondent : Mr.R.N.Amarnath
2
C.SARAVANAN,J.
jen
O R D E R
When the case is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for
the petitioners submitted that the case has settled between the parties. She has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.Recording the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is
dismissed as infructous. No costs.
07.03.2019
Index:Yes/No
Internet :Yes/No
jen
To
1.The VII Judge (Rent Control Appellate Authority)
Court of Small Causes, Chennai.
2.The XII Judge Court of Small Causes
Madras (Rend Controller).
C.R.P.(NPD).Nos.1298 of 2014
P.Nandakumari
C.Vijayakumar
C.Saravanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
