This judgment records the dismissal of a civil revision petition filed under Section 115 of the CPC. Due to the non-appearance of counsel on behalf of the petitioners during the hearing on the listed date, the court dismissed the petition for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.04.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1161 of 2011
2
3
Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of CPC against the order dated 20.12.2010 in I.A.No.770 of 2004 in O.S.No.412 of 1974 on the file of the I Additional Subordinate Court, Cuddalore.
For Petitioners : No appearance For respondents : Mr.M.Baskaran ORDER
This petition has been filed against the order dated 20.12.2010 in I.A.No.770 of 2004 in O.S.No.412 of 1974 on the file of the I Additional Subordinate Court, Cuddalore.
4
N.SATHISH KUMAR,J .
nsd
with the order. Hence, this Court dismissed the C.R.P. as against the seventh respondent as abated on 20.03.2019 and posted the matter for arguments on 05.04.2019. Again, the matter was posted on 15.04.2019, for hearing.
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1161 of 2011
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition should be allowed without the appearance of the petitioners.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Saraswathi Ammal and others
Radhabai Ammal and others
N. Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court