The Criminal Revision Petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioner, who had endorsed withdrawal, with liberty to raise points after charge framing at the trial court.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to raise points before trial court after charge framing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.06.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
Crl.R.C.No.599 of 2019
Nagendran ... Petitioner -VsState represented by The Inspector of Police North Police Station Thiruppur. .. Respondent Criminal Revision Petition filed under section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside the order dated 21.03.2019 passed against the petition in Crl.M.P.No.217 of 2019 in C.C.No.180 of 2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tiruppur.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Manikandan For Respondent : Mr.G.Ramar Government Advocate ***** O R D E R
When this Court was about to dismiss this petition on merits and since there are prima facie materials for framing charges, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the same and has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sub Assistant Registrar mk
To
Crl.R.C.No.599 of 2019
VSN-II(CO) SSM(16/07/2019)
Nagendran
State represented by The Inspector of Police North Police Station Thiruppur
P.N. Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
