Disposed

P.Sathish@Sathish Kumar v. State Rep by

Madras HC13 Feb 2019CRL RC/137/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Police powers to adjudicate security proceedings and Executive Magistrates’ powers to imprison for bond breaches were challenged. The court invalidated the enabling government orders, confined Section 110 bond breaches to Section 446, and required judicial adjudication for Section 107 breaches. It set aside affected orders, directed conditional release, and remanded specified revenue-authority pro

What did the court decide?

Government orders invalidated; affected proceedings and detention orders set aside; release directed unless required in another case; specified matters remanded to a single judge.

P.Sathish@Sathish Kumar Vs State Rep by — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

Crl.RC.No.137 of 2018 etc., cases And Crl.RC.No.78 of 2020 etc., cases

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 28.02.2023 PRONOUNCED ON : 13.03.2023

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

CRL.RC.Nos.137/2018,78/2020,616/2015,1213/2016,1217/2016,1214/2016, 1215/2016, 1216/2016,1312/2016,1569/2016,161/2017,1366/2017,1367/2017,1392/2017,1393/2017, 1439/2017,1585/2017,1478/2017,1479/2017,1501/2017,1528/2017,1540/2017 ,1541/2017, 991/2018,1164/2018,1241/2018,970/2018,WP(MD).No.24662/2019, Crl.RC.Nos.1025/2018, 982/2018,1286/2018,1322/2018,1371/2018,72/2019,1386/2018, 1410/2018,1511/2018,54/2019,

¶7

1066/2018,1142/2018,87/2019,955/2018,993/2018, 1295/2018,1422/2018,1474/2018, 1476/2018, 26/2020,61/2020,107/2020,117/2020, 251/2020,285/2020,298/2020, 336/2020, 344/2020, 404/2020,472/2020,473/2020, 484/2020, 485/2020, 488/2020, 512/2020,515/2020, 516/2020,528/2020,540/2020, 543/2020, 553/2020,562/2020,564/2020, 567/2020, 569/2020, 577/2020, 580/2020, 592/2020,610/2020, 622/2020, 640/2020, 725/2020, 751/2020, 754/2020, 758/2020, 772/2020, 773/2020,784/2020, 790/2020,817/2020,822/2020, 851/2020, 858/2020, 859/2020,861/2020,865/2020,867/2020, 868/2020, 873/2020,883/2020, 891/2020, 892/2020, 900/2020,921/2020,924/2020,927/2020, 938/2020,947/2020, 954/2020, 954/2020,957/2020,

¶8

963/2020,971/2020,978/2020,993/2020, 1013/2020, 1017/2020, 1022/2020,1023/2020, 1027/2020,1028/2020, 1031/2020, 1061/2020, 1063/2020, 1072/2020,1086/2020,1094/2020, 1096/2020,1098/2020,1008/2020, 1116/2020, 1127/2020, 1197/2020,1204/2020,1224/2020, 1243/2020,300/2021,334/2021,335/2021, 353/2021,357/2021,433/2021, 688/2021,778/2021, 781/2021,880/2021, 905/2021, 913/2021,914/2021,916/2021, 923/2021,925/2021,951/2021,

¶9

1/123

S No.	Title P	aragraph Nos.
I	Backdrop to the Reference	1
II	Questions for Consideration	2
III	Submissions	3 to 6
IV	Discussion
	Re: Questions (ii) and (iv)	7 to 41
	Re : Questions (i) and (iii)	42 to 83
V	Conclusions	84 to 95

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

P.Gajendran Vs the Presiding Officer

Mariamma Vs The Deputy Commissioner of

Aravindh Blue Metaal Vs The Commissioner of Geology and Mining

K.Angammal Vs the Director of Adi

P.v.Mohan Vs Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd.

The Commandant, Vs the Central Government