Dismissed

Sree Kamal Release v. P.N.Sundararajan

Madras HC24 Jun 2019CRL RC/1272/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Revision against conviction under Section 138 NI Act failed. High Court upheld earlier order directing trial court to secure accused and commit him to prison for remaining sentence due to non-payment of cheque amount by appeal period.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be secured by trial court and committed to prison to undergo remaining sentence. Conditional payment ignored due to non-compliance.

Sree Kamal Release Vs P.N.Sundararajan — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 28.02.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

Crl.RC.No. 1272 of 2010

¶6

Sree Kamal Release Rep. by its Proprietor Kalaiselvan ...Petitioner/Appellant/Accused

¶7

Vs.

¶8

P.N.Sundarajan

¶9

2.Shanthi Sundarajan ...Respondents/Respondent/complainant

¶10

Prayer: Petition filed under Section 397 r/w of 101 Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the order dated 12.07.2010 made in C.A.No.118/2009 on the file of Additional District and Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court II) Gobichettipalayam confirming the judgment dated 22.06.2009 and made in C.C.No.384/2006 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I,Gobichettipalayam.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr. M.N.Balakrishnan

¶12

For Respondents : Mr.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran

¶13

ORDER

¶14

The present revision has been filed by the petitioner/accused against the dismissal of Crl.A.No.118/2009 vide impugned judgment dated 12.07.2010 by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.2, Gobichettipalayam, confirming the judgment of the learned judicial Magistrate No.1, Gobichettipalayam, dated 22.06.2009 in CC.No.384/2006, finding the petitioner/accused guilty for the commission of the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and convicting and sentencing him to undergo 2 years of simple imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/with a default condition, to undergo three months simple imprisonment.

¶15

On an earlier occasion, this Court vide order dated 24.06.2019 in Crl.RC.No.1272/2010, directed the revision petitioner herein, to pay the cheque amount viz., Rs10,00,000/- as agreed between the parties, on or before https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 31.10.2019, and if the said amount is not paid within the

¶16

specified period, the petitioner/accused shall surrender before the Trial Court to undergo the period of sentence or else the trial Court shall secure the petitioner /accused and commit him to custody to undergo the period of sentence.

¶17

When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is brought

¶18

to the notice of this Court that the complainant did not complied the condition and, therefore, the legal heirs of the complainant, are necessary parties and they have been impleaded as party respondents. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the legal heirs of the complainant are female members and that they want only cash settlement, which the petitioner is not able to mobilize as he is unable to sell his family property to settle the said amount. Therefore, in fine, it is accepted by the petitioner that he has not complied with the condition imposed on him with regard to payment of the cheque amount.

¶19

In the above circumstances, as already directed vide order dated 24.6.2019, the condition imposed having not been complied with, the trial court is directed to take steps to secure the present of the accused/petitioner, if he does not surrender on his own, and commit him to prison to undergo the remaining period of sentence imposed on him.

¶20

The criminal revision stands dismissed with the aforesaid observation and direction.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar (CCC)

¶23

//True Copy//

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

jrs

¶26

¶27

The Additional District and Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court II) Gobichettipalayam.

¶28

2.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Gobichettipalayam.

¶29

do Thro The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Erode.

¶30

Copy To

¶31

1.The Secretary,

¶32

District Legal Services Authority,

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Erode.

¶34

2.The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court, Madras.

¶35

Crl.RC.No. 1272 of 2010

¶36

GJ(CO) GN(15/07/2020)

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sree Kamal Release v. P.N.Sundararajan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sree Kamal Release v. P.N.Sundararajan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Govindan Vs State Rep by

Yuvraj Venkatesan Vs the State Rep.by

Kalyanasundaram Vs State by

Bakiyam Vs Saroja

The State Rep by Its, Vs N.Seenivasagan

M.G.Gopal Vs State Rep by