The High Court of Madras dismissed a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the Cr.P.C. as withdrawn by the counsel for the petitioner upon obtaining necessary permission, closing the connected miscellaneous petition as well.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated 15.10.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.R.C.No.1119 of 2016 and
Crl.M.P.No.9701 of 2016
P.Balasubramanian .. Petitioner/Respondent Vs
Punitha .. Respondent/Petitioner
Prayer:- This Criminal Revision has been filed by the petitioner/respondent under Section 397 read with 401 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the order and decree dated 19.02.2016, made in M.P.No.22/2016 in Crl.M.P.No.1988/2014, passed by the learned XVII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Hussain Afroze
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court, to withdraw this Criminal Revision and he has also made an endorsement in this petition to that effect.
2 In view of the submissions and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision stands dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(J)
Sub Assistant Registrar
ssi
1/2
To:
Crl.R.C.No.1119 of 2016 and Crl.M.P.No.9701 of 2016
nr 05/11/2019
2/2
2 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Balasubramanian
Punitha
A.D.Jagadish Chandira
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
