Disposed

Madasamy, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC25 Apr 2019CRL OP(MD)/3647/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail on bond in an anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The Court noted a discrepancy where the de facto complainant claimed a loan was settled by Indirani (the 21st accused) yet continued to prosecute her. Consequently, the Deputy Registrar was directed to submit a report on all transactions.

What did the court decide?

The Deputy Registrar, Agriculture Co-Operative Society, Mudukulathur is directed to file a report regarding the entire transactions on or before 02.04.2019.

Madasamy, Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Nineteenth day of March Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.3647 of 2019

¶7

1 MADASAMY
2 VEERAPANDI
3 MURUGAN
4 PRINSH @ PRINCE STALIN ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED 1 to 4
Vs
STATE REP. BY,
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
MUDUKULATHUR POLICE STATION,
RAMNAD DISTRICT
(CRIME NO.17/2019) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioners : MR.T.LENIN KUMAR Advocate
For Respondent : MR.S.CHANDRASEKAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶8

The defacto complainant is the President of Agriculture CoOperative Society. He made allegations against the Ex- President and Officer bearers of the said society as if 17 sheep loan was paid to other accused persons in which the amount was not repaid, hence the defacto complainant filed the present complaint.

¶9

The learned counsel for the petitioners 1 to 4 submitted a letter dated 07.02.2019 stating that the entire amount was paid by one Indirani.

¶10

The defacto complainant in his letter dated 07.02.2019, he has stated that one Indirani 21^st accused has settled the loan amount. However he has filed complaint against Indirani/A21 , hence there is something fishy on the part of the defacto complainant.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Hence the Deputy Registrar, Agriculture Co-Operative Society, Mudukulathur is directed to file a report regarding the

¶12

¶13

entire transactions done by the petitioners as well as the defacto complainant to this Court on or before 02.04.2019.

¶14

Post the matter on 02.04.2019.
sd/-
19/03/2019
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
MUDUKULATHUR POLICE STATION,
RAMNAD DISTRICT
2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
COPY TO:- THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR,
AGRICULTURE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY,
MUDUKULATHUR
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.3647 of 2019
Date :19/03/2019
MSI/JC/SAR 4/22.03.2019/2P-4C

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Madasamy, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madasamy, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gnanatheebam Vs the Inspector of Police

Mr.N.Subramani Vs Mr.N.Velu

Kannan @ Damodaran Vs R.Vasudevan

R. Ajith Raja,S/O.Rajamanickam Vs the Inspector of Police

Selvaraj, S/O.Velsamy Thevar Vs the Inspector of Police

Kothaiammal Died Vs Murugesan