Dismissed

Sarbudeen v. the Deputy Superintendent of

Madras HC20 Nov 2019CRL OP(MD)/2978/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court dismissed a criminal original petition seeking to quash an alteration report. It held that with the completion of investigation by the NIA and filing of a final report, the petition cannot be granted. The petitioner was advised to file under the NIA Act. Connected MP also dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; liberty granted to file petition under NIA Act.

Sarbudeen Vs the Deputy Superintendent of — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

CRL.O.P (MD) No.2978 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.11.2019 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶4

CRL.O.P (MD) No.2978 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.(MD) No.1634 of 2019

Sarbudeen

... Petitioner/A4

1.State represented by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruvidai Marudhur Division, Thanjavur District.

¶9

2.State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thiruvidai Marudhur Division, Thanjavur District.

¶10

3.R.Shiyamsundar

¶11

4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, National Investigation Agency, Cochin. ... Respondents (R4 suomotu impleaded as per order of this Court dated 23.09.2019)

¶12

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to call for the entire records pertaining to the impugned alteration report dated 06.02.2019 in connection with Crime No.17 of 2019 on the file of the 1^st respondent and quash the same as illegal as against the petitioner.

¶13

For Petitioners : Mr.S.A.S.Alaudeen For Respondents : Mr.K.Suyambulinga bharathi, G.A. (Crl. Side) for R1 and 2 Mr.R.Karthikeyan, Spl.P.P. For R4

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

This petition has been filed to quash the impugned alteration report dated 06.02.2019 in connection with Crime No.17 of 2019 on the file of the 1^st respondent as against the petitioner.

¶16

2.The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Without any base, the 2^nd respondent police registered a case in Crime No.17 of 2019 for the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

1/2

¶18

CRL.O.P (MD) No.2978 of 2019

¶19

offences under Sections 294(B), 341 and 307 of IPC. However, later, the investigation has been handed over to the National Investigation Agency and they have completed the investigation and filed final report for the offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 120(B), 341, 294(B), 302 r/w 149 of I.P.C. and Section 15(a)(i)(b) r/w 16, 18, 18 (B), 19 & 20 of UA(P) Act (Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967) before the Special Court, (NIA), Bomb Blast Court, Poonamalle, Chennai and the same has been taken cognizance in C.C.No.2 of 2019.

¶20

3.Considering the subsequent development in this case, the prayer sought for by the petitioner to quash the impugned alteration report dated 06.02.2019 in connection with Crime No.17 of 2019 on the file of the 1^st respondent cannot be granted by this Court.

¶21

4.Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a petition under the provisions of National Investigation Agency Act for appropriate relief. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar (CS-II)

¶24

// True Copy //

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶26

¶27

1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruvidai Marudhur Division, Thanjavur District.

¶28

2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruvidai Marudhur Division, Thanjavur District.

¶29

The Deputy Superintenent of Police, National Investigation Agency, Cochin.

¶30

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶31

+1 CC to M/s.R. KARTHIKEYAN, Advocate ( SR-99891[F] 20/11/2019 )

¶32

Order made in CRL.O.P (MD) No.2978 of 2019 20.11.2019

¶33

Arul

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ SDS/03.01.2020/2P-6C

¶35

2/2

Sarbudeen v. the Deputy Superintendent of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sarbudeen v. the Deputy Superintendent of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J.Saradha Vs The Superintendent of police

Kadar ibrahim Vs The Superintendent of police

C.Boomadevi Vs The Superintendent of police

Annalakshmi Vs The Superintendent of Police

Natham R.Viswanathan Vs The Inspector of Police

Ct. Subramanian Vs the Inspector of Police