Allowed

Mrs.Sumathi, v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Madras HC6 Feb 2019CRL OP(MD)/1679/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. conditions that required surrender upon arrest, execution of a bond with sureties, and appearance at the special judge, despite previous non-compliance.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on conditions of surrender upon arrest, execution of bond with sureties, and strict compliance of procedural requirements.

Mrs.Sumathi, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Sixth day of February Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.1679 of 2019

¶7

SUMATHI, ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.4

¶8

¶9

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE , EOW, TIRUNELVELI.

¶10

... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.R.RAMASAMY Advocate

¶12

For Respondent : MRS.M.ANANTHADEVI

¶13

Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶14

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶15

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶16

The petitioner was earlier granted anticipatory bail by this Court on 19.06.2018. The petitioner however did not surrender as directed. Therefore, the earlier order granted got itself worked out. Hence, the petitioner has filed this petition for anticipatory bail.

¶17

2.The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 120(b) of IPC and Section 5 of TNPID Act, in Crime No.3 of 2016.

¶18

3.Taking notes of the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court had already granted relief to her, I am of the view that sufficient reasons have been given for the petitioner's non compliance of the order passed earlier.

¶19

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Special Judge for TANPID Cases, Madurai, and on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the

¶20

¶21

petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶22

5.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶23

sd/06/02/2019

¶24

/ TRUE COPY /

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶26

¶27

1.THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TANPID CASES, MADURAI.

¶28

2.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE

¶29

EOW, TIRUNELVELI.

¶30

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶31

+1. CC to MR.R.RAMASAMY Advocate SR.No.2576

¶32

ORDER

¶33

¶34

CRL OP(MD) No.1679 of 2019 Date :06/02/2019 AE/JC/SAR-II/15.02.2019/2P/5C

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mrs.Sumathi, v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs.Sumathi, v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anbarasan Vs the Inspector of Police

Happy(Hygiene Awareness Vs the Commissioner

M.v.Pandian, Vs the Assistant Director of

S. Kopperundevi, Vs the Commissioner

R.Lakshmi, Vs the Tahsildar

Ayyappan, S/O.Subbaiah, Vs the Inspector of Police