Partly allowed

L. Ramsankar v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC24 Oct 2019CRL OP(MD)/15369/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge ordered anticipatory bail for accused No.6 apprehending arrest in a case under Section 379 IPC and Mines and Minerals Act clause 21(1). Bail granted pending appearance before magistrate within 15 days or arrest.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to deposit of Rs.25,000 as security, executing a bond with sureties, appearance for interrogation, and appearance before the Magistrate within 15 days.

L. Ramsankar Vs The Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.15369 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 24/10/2019

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.15369 of 2019

¶8

L. Ramsankar, ... Petitioner/Accused No.6

¶9

¶10

The State Rep by The Inspector of Police, Soorankudi Police Station, Thoothukudi District Cr.No.47/2018.

¶11

... Respondent/Complainant

¶12

For Petitioner : M/s. P. Banuprasath, Advocate.

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶14

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶15

PRAYER :-

¶16

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.47 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police.

¶17

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶18

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶19

2.The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 379 of I.P.C. and 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulations) Act, 1957, in Crime No.47 of 2018, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶20

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner undertakes that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Twenty Five Thousand Only) as non-refundable deposit to the

¶21

1/2

¶22

CRL OP(MD). No.15369 of 2019

¶23

concerned District Mineral Foundation Trust.

¶24

4.Recording the said undertaking given by the petitioner's counsel, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vilathikulam, Thoothukudi District, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously.

¶25

5.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/-

24/10/2019

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶30

¶31

Judicial Magistrate, Vilathikulam, Thoothukudi District.

¶32

Do-Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tuticorin District.

¶33

The Inspector of Police, Soorankudi Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

¶34

The Additional Public Prosecutor,

¶35

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶36

The Officer Incharge, District Mineral Foundation Trust, Thoothukudi.

¶37

+1CC TO MR.P.BANU PRASATH, Advocate Sr. No. 18453

¶38

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15369 of 2019 Date : 24/10/2019

¶39

TR/SKN/SAR-III(01.11.2019) 2P 7C

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶41

2/2

L. Ramsankar v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

L. Ramsankar v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Annakodi Vs the Inspector of Police

R. Indumathi Vs the Inspector of Police

M.Sakthivel Vs the Inspector of Police

Ragavendran Vs The Inspector of Police

R. Sivaraman Vs the Inspector of Police

Renganathan @ Rengaraj Vs The Inspector of Police