This is a one-line order disposing of a Criminal Original Petition filed for police protection. The court noted the Second Respondent classified the complaint as civil in nature and closed the petition without granting further relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P(MD).No. 10754 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 10.09.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Crl.O.P(MD).No. 10754 of 2019
A. Pandiselvi
... Petitioner
Vs.
Madurai District.
... Respondents
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the second respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner, on the basis of his complaint, dated 21.07.2019.
For Petitioner : No Appearance
For Respondents-1 & 2 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi
Government Advocate(Crl.Side)
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner, on the basis of his complaint, dated 21.07.2019.
1/2
Crl.O.P(MD).No. 10754 of 2019
3.With the above observation, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
/TRUE COPY/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
Crl.O.P(MD)No. 10754 of 2019 10.09.2019
ksa
JM/30.09.2019/2P/4C
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A. Pandiselvi
The Superintendent of Police, Madurai
The Inspector of Police Kallikudi Police Station
Petchiammal
Neelamegam
Uthirakumar
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
