offences under Sections 120 (b), 420, 500, 506(ii) I.P.C. r/w 34 I.P.C. as against all the accused. The accused knowing fully well that there is no employment at Saudi Arabia made a false promise to the respondent that they are sending him to serve in Saudi Arabia for employment purpose and made him to work at Bangalore to achieve their object of getting the respondent who is with the special knowledge to work at Bangalore for Mobily and thus gained wrongfully for themselves. Therefore, the offence under Section 420 is clearly made out as against the petitioners. In respect of Section 506 I.P.C. is concerned there is a prima facie case for criminal intimidation to attract offence under Section 506(ii) I.P.C. as against the petitioners / accused and the accused conspired together and acted as against the respondent to remove him from the company as he was standing as an impediment to get more improper revenue and also that he complained about the malafide acts of the accused to the authorities. Therefore, the offences under Sections 120 (b), 420, 500, 506(ii) I.P.C. r/w 34 I.P.C. are squarely made out as against the petitioners and all the points raised by the petitioners herein can be raised only during trial before the trial court. In fact, initially the learned Magistrate have taken cognizance and issued summons to the petitioners. The said summons were challenged before this Court and this Court remitted the matter back to the trial Court to conduct enquiry under Section 202 Cr.P.C. and thereafter the trial court conducted detailed enquiry and on receipt of report from the concerned jurisdictional police namely, the Inspector of Police, J10 Semmanchery Police Station and have taken cognizance for the offence under Sections 120 (b), 420, 500, 506 (ii) I.P.C. r/w 34 I.P.C. and also relied upon the following five judgments.
