Dismissed

Jagadish C Bojani, M/a 70 Yrs, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC9 Apr 2019CRL OP/6667/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to withdraw and transfer investigation of FIR to another competent authority. Court declined transfer, directed first respondent to complete investigation within three months and monitor it by DCP CCB Coimbatore.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed. First respondent directed to complete investigation and file final report within three months under supervision of DCP CCB Coimbatore.

Jagadish C Bojani, M/a 70 Yrs, Vs the Inspector of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.04.2019

¶2

CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶4

Crl.O.P.No.6667 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.3410 of 2018 Jagadish C. Bojani ... Petitioner

¶5

Vs. 1.State Rep., by The Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Coimbatore. 2.The Inspector of Polcie, CBCID, Coimbatore. 3.T.Narendaran ...Respondents (3^rd respondent is Impleaded as per order of this Hon'ble Court dt.14/03/2019 made in Crl.MP.No.4423/18 in Crl.OP.6667/2018) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to withdraw and transfer of investigation in respect of FIR in Crime No.22 of 2015 on the file of the first respondent to any individual competent authority herein. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Kumar, Sr.C. for Mr.M.R.Sivakumar For Respondents: Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, for R1 & R2 Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶6

Mr.P.S.Raman, Sr.C. for Mr.K.S.Karthik Raja for R3.

¶7

O R D E R

¶8

This petition has been filed to withdraw and transfer the investigation in respect of FIR in Crime No.22 of 2015 on the file of the first respondent to any individual competent authority.

¶9

2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the investigation officer has been transferred now and a new investigation officer has taken charge.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

3.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to transfer the investigation from the the file of *first respondent to any other agency. The *first respondent is directed to complete the investigation and file the final report within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The entire investigation has to be monitored by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, CCB, Coimbatore.

¶12

4.With the above directions, this criminal original
petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous
petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
Dated : 29/04/2019
*Corrected as per order
dated 04/06/2019
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
Dated : 10/06/2019
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
AT
To To be Substituted to the order
already dispatched on 10/05/2019
1.The Inspector of Police,
City Crime Branch,
Coimbatore.
2.The Inspector of Police,
CBCID,
Coimbatore.
3.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.K.S.Karthik Raja, Advocate, S.R.No.35407 *& 45002
+1cc to Mr.M.R.Sivakumar, Advocate, S.R.No.34881
Crl.O.P.No.6667 of 2018
RV(CO)
RRS(29/04/2019)
GMY(10/06/2019)

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Jagadish C Bojani, M/a 70 Yrs, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagadish C Bojani, M/a 70 Yrs, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Sengodan Vs the Deputy Director General of Police

Kannichamy Alias Palanisamy Vs the Deputy Superintendent

R.Kathiravan Vs a.Bhuvaneswari

Duraisamy, Aged 45 Years Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

S.Geetha Vs the State of Tamilnadu Rep by

Leela Vs the State Rep. by