6. A perusal of the domestic incident report shows that the address for respondent herein has been given as she is residing with her husband in a house bearing D.No.46/25 Nelvayal Road, Perambur, Chennai – 11. Further, it is stated that the third petitioner herein/4 th respondent also residing in the same house. However, in the said report, it is stated that the petitioners 2 and 3 herein/respondents 2 and 3 therein are residing somewhere else. Further it is stated that the petitioners 2 and 3 herein already married and they were residing with their husbands. The condition precedent for entertaining the petition under the protection of women from Domestic Violence Act, is that the aggrieved person, who is or has been in a domestic relationship with the respondent in a shared household. In this case, as already pointed out that the petitioners 1 and 2 are sisters of the respondent's husband and they got already married and they are residing somewhere else and therefore, the provisions of the protection of women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, would not attract against the petitioners 1 and 2. In so far as the petitioner No.3 is concerned, in the domestic incident report, it is clearly stated that she is also residing with her son (first respondent therein) along with the respondent
