V.Perumal v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash proceedings, holding the prayer infructuous as investigation and charge sheet were completed.
What did the court decide?
The criminal original petition was dismissed as infructuous. Connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.02.2019
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Crl.O.P.No.3484 of 2019
and
Crl.M.P.No.2244 of 2018
1.V.Perumal 2.P.Sivaselvam
3.Ananthavalli ...Petitioners/Accused 1 to 3
Vs 1.State by Inspector of Police Mailam Police Station Villupuram District (Crime No.79 of 2018)
2.Moorthi ...Respondents/De-facto Complainant
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for the records in Crime No.79 of 2018 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Mailam Police Station, Villupuram District and quash the proceedings pending against the petitioners herein.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer to quash criminal proceedings stands infructuous given the completed investigation and filing of charge sheet.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
1.V.Perumal
- petitioner
2.P.Sivaselvam
- petitioner
3.Ananthavalli
- respondent
State by Inspector of Police Mailam Police Station
- respondent
Moorthi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court