3.The respondent is working as Section Officer in Madras University and she spent her saving, salary and availed society loan for house construction in Gandhi Nagar, Ekkatuthangal. The second petitioner compelled the 1st petitioner and the respondent to adopt her son namely Gnanasekaran @ Srinath and to transfer the property in his name and when she opposed the same they harassed her verbally and instigated her husband to desert her by all means and besides her husband's sisters family were always staying in the matrimonial house and the whole night he did not allow her inside and finally the respondent went to her father's house. At the instigation of the second and third respondents the respondent could not join with the first petitioner. Finally on 01.08.2017 she lodged a complaint with the All Women Police Station, Guindy, which was registered vide C.S.R.No.303/2017, seeking to re-unite with her husband. Based on the assurance given by her husband the case was closed. When she went to the matrimonial home she was restrained from entering into the house. The first petitioner filed H.M.O.P.No.3370 of 2017 before the Family Court at Chennai seeking Divorce on the ground of cruelty. The above said divorce petition was filed at the instigation of the second and third petitioners. The respondent was under the impression that she could meet her husband in Court and solve the issue through mediation. But the first petitioner was accompanied with the second and third petitioners and because of their instigation and advice the counselling also failed. Hence, the respondent filed a domestic case in D.V.C.No.64 of 2018 on the file of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai.
