The High Court at Madras disposed of a Crl.O.P. filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking direction to the police to take cognizance of a complaint. The Court ruled the petition was not maintainable due to a prior Division Bench order and permitted the petitioner to work out remedies as directed therein.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.12.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM
Crl.O.P.No.26061 of 2019
Perumalkani ...Petitioner -VsState by The Inspector of Police, Kinathukadavu Police Station, Pollachi, Coimbatore District. ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondent police to take further action on the petitioner's complaint dated 29.08.2019. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Shankar For Respondents: Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R
This criminal original petition has been filed to direct the respondent police to take further action on the petitioner's complaint dated 29.08.2019.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
Crl.O.P.No.26061 of 2019
BS(CO)
GN(29/01/2020)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of CrPC is maintainable given a prior Division Bench order.
Whether the petitioner can direct the respondent police to take further action on the complaint.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Crl.OP(MD)No.13681 of 2018Followed¶3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Perumalkani
State represented by The Inspector of Police, Kinathukadavu Police Station
P. Rajamanickam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
