Disposed

M.Ramasamy, M/a 52 Years, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC25 Sept 2019CRL OP/14964/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras closed a Criminal Original Petition filed to quash a charge sheet and dispense with personal appearance, deciding the matter against graciously to dispose of any imputations on procedural grounds as the trial court was seized of the case.

What did the court decide?

The criminal original petition (Crl.O.P.) and connected miscellaneous petition (Crl.M.P.) are closed and disposed of without considerations of grounds.

M.Ramasamy, M/a 52 Years, Vs the Inspector of Police — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 25.09.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.14964 of 2018

¶6

and

¶7

Crl.M.P.No.7550 of 2018

¶8

M.Ramasamy ... Petitioner Versus 1.The Inspector of Police, Vridhachalam Police Station, Vridhachalam, Cuddalore District. (Crime No.301 of 2011) 2.Rajendran ... Respondents

¶9

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying

¶10

a) Dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner in C.C.No.87 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vridhachalam, Cuddalore District.

¶11

b) Grant stay of all further proceedings in C.C.No.87 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vridhachalam, Cuddalore District.

¶12

c) Call for the entire records concerned in C.C.No.87 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vridhachalam, Cuddalore District and quash the same.

¶13

For Petitioner : M/s.R.Hemalatha

¶14

For R1 : Mr.C.Iyyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 : Mr.K.Gangadaran

¶15

The grounds raised in the present petition seeking to quash the charge sheet are all the factual aspects which require to be established during the course of the trial.

¶16

2.Though the learned counsel for the petitioner herein has raised several grounds challenging the charge sheet, this court

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

is consciously deferring from giving any of its reasoning since the Trial Court is seized of the matter and proceedings are pending on its file.

¶19

3.The petitioner is at liberty to raise all the grounds at the time of final disposal of the proceedings in C.C.No.87 of 2018 before the Court below.

¶20

4.For the foregoing reasons, this Criminal Original Petition stands closed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶21

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (Insp Cell)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sbn/klt
To
1.The Inspector of Police,
Vridhachalam Police Station,
Vridhachalam, Cuddalore District.
2. The Additional Public Prosecutor,
High Court of Madras.
+1cc to Mr.Prakasam, Advocate, S.R.No. 83137

¶22

Crl.O.P.No.14964 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.7550 of 2018

¶23

MG(CO) GN(01/11/2019)

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Ramasamy, M/a 52 Years, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Ramasamy, M/a 52 Years, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gowri Vs State Rep. by

Ellar.Sezhian, Vs the State Rep by Its

M.Twinkle Amala Vs D.Antony Muthu Thangaraj

Jeeva, M/A.31 Vs the Regional Passport Officer

Rameshwar Vs the Superintendent of Police

Mr.Ramu Kalanjiam Suresh, Vs M/S.Paceman Finance India