The Single Judge extended the time for completing proceedings in a listed STC case to six months from the lifting of the pandemic lockdown, contrary to the initial four-month request.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Twenty Second day of May Two Thousand Twenty
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.13725 of 2017 and CRL.MP.NO.8826 OF 2017
N.B.RAMALINGAM, [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
P.KRISHNAMOORTHY [ RESPONDENT ]
For Petitioner : M/S.V.RAJESH Advocate
For Respondent : MR. V.P.K.GOUTHAM Advocate
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The learned Judicial Officer has sought for extension of time by six months.
2.This Court by an earlier order dated 17.07.2019 while dismissing the Crl.O.P.No.13725 of 2017 had directed to complete the proceedings in S.T.C.NO.109 OF 2013 within a period of two months from the dated of receipt of a copy of the order.
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
CC to M/S.V.RAJESH Advocate on payment of necessary charges
CRL OP.13725/2017
and CRL.MP.NO.8826 OF 2017
Date :22/05/2020
RD 27/05/2020
N.B. Ramalingam
P. Krishnamoorthy
A.D.Jagadish Chandra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
