Dac Promotors v. the State Represented by
Case brief
What is this about?
This order closes a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of an FIR after the investigating agency completed the investigation and submitted a final report deleting the petitioner's name, marking him as a witness in the subsequent trial.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.08.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Crl.O.P.No. 12470 of 2019 Crl.M.P.No.6487 of 2019
DAC Promoters Proprietor S.Sathish Kumar, S/o.Santhanam, No.19, K-block, 1st Main Road, 1st Avenue, Anna Nagar East, Chennai - 600 102.
... Petitioner/Accused No.4
Vs.
- The State represented by The Inspector of Police, CCB Team II, Anti Land Grabbing Cell, Vepery, Chennai, Crime No.17 of 2018
..1st Respondent/Complainant
- P.G.Muthaiyalu ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in Crime No.17 of 2018 on the file of the first respondent, Chennai and quash the same as against the petitioner.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to quash an FIR registered for offences of cheating, forgery, and criminal conspiracy against the petitioner after the police investigation has been completed and the petitioner has been remov
Whether the petitioner, a bonafide purchaser who obtained anticipatory bail and an interim injunction, should be a party to the criminal proceedings given the police have filed a final report deleting
Whether to discharge the connected miscellaneous petition upon the closure of the original petition for quashing.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Sathish Kumar
- respondent
State represented by The Inspector of Police, CCB Team II, Anti Land Grabbing Cell, Vepery, Chennai
- respondent
P.G.Muthaiyalu
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court