Disposed

Sahil Ahmed v. the State Rep. by

Madras HC11 Jan 2019CRL OP/1035/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court disposed of a bail petition by rejecting the primary application for anticipatory bail. Instead, the petitioner was directed to appear before the lower court within two weeks to file a petition to recall the issued non-bailable warrant and seek bail on merits based on their illness.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; petitioners directed to appear within two weeks to recall NBW and seek bail on merits.

Sahil Ahmed Vs the State Rep. by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Thirty First day of January Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.1035 of 2019

¶7

[ ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE FOR CCB AND CBCID CASES AT EGMORE, CHENNAI ] 1 SAHIL AHMED [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 SAKKRI AHMED

¶8

THE STATE REP. BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH, TEAM-II, VEPPERY, CHENNAI-600 007. (X.CRIME NO.181/2014)

¶9

For Petitioner : M/S.R.VIJAYAKUMAR Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : MRS.PRABHAVATHI, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶11

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of I.P.C., in Crime No.181 of 2014, seek anticipatory bail.

¶14

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that on 12.10.2018, due to illness, the petitioner was not able to appear before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate for CCB and CBCID at Egmore, in respect of the case in C.C.No.6092 of 2016 and hence, non bailable warrant has been issued against the petitioners. He would further submit that the said absence is neither willful nor wanton and he undertakes that the petitioners shall appear before the Court below regularly on all future hearing dates without fail.

¶15

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the non bailable warrant has been issued against the petitioners on 07.01.2018 and the same is pending.

¶16

Considering the undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners are directed to appear before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate for CCB and CBCID at Egmore, within https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ a period of two weeks from today and to file a petition to recall NBW

¶17

already issued against them. On filing of such petition, the concerned learned Judicial Magistrate is directed to consider the same on merits and pass orders on the same day.

¶18

This criminal original petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶19

-sd/31/01/2019

¶20

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶21

TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
CCB AND CBCID, EGMORE, CHENNAI
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH, TEAM-II,
VEPPERY, CHENNAI-600 007.
CC to M/S.R.VIJAYAKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges
CRL OP.1035/2019
Date :31/01/2019
ths : 05.02.2019

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sahil Ahmed v. the State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sahil Ahmed v. the State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Meenal Pandian (Wrongly Vs the Inspector of Police

N.Nagarajan Vs State Rep.by

Sarsivi Raman Vs the State Rep. by

Gandhi Vs State, Represented by

S.Lakshmi Vs the Inspector of Police

Hassan Basha Vs State Rep by