Allowed

Shankar @ Shankaranarayanan v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC3 Jun 2019CRL MP(MD)/4396/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought relaxation of a condition requiring daily appearance at the police station under anticipatory bail due to residing in Chennai instead of Madurai. The court allowed the petition, relaxing the daily reporting requirement while retaining the power to summon the petitioner for interrogation. Adv. Vaigunth for the petitioner and Addl. Public Prosecutor Mr. Neelakandan appeared.

What did the court decide?

Condition imposed in Crl.OP(MD) No.3132 of 2019 is relaxed; petitioner to report when required for interrogation.

Shankar @ Shankaranarayanan Vs the Inspector… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 03/06/2019

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM

¶7

CRL MP(MD) No.4396 of 2019 in CRL OP(MD) No.3132 of 2019

¶8

Shankar @ Shankaranarayanan ... Petitioner/2^nd Petitioner

¶9

¶10

The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai City.

¶11

(Crime No.63/2019). ... Respondent/Respondent

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner by this Honourable Court in Crl.OP(MD)No.3132/2019 dated 28.02.2019.

¶13

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.A.S.Vaigunth, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.V.NEELAKANDAN, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶14

This petition has been filed by the petitioner/accused to relax the condition, which was imposed by this Court in Crl.OP(MD) No.3132 of 2019 dated 28.02.2019.

¶15

2.Heard both sides.

¶16

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that while granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner, this Court, in the aforesaid order directed the petitioner to appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court, the petitioner is regularly https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ appearing before the respondent police from 17.04.2019 onwards. He further submitted that the petitioner from the date of executing the

¶17

¶18

bond i.e. from 17.04.2019, the petitioner is a native of Chennai and he is not able to appear before the respondent police at Madurai, daily at 10.30 a.m and therefore, the said relaxation petition has been filed.

¶19

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has fairly conceded

¶20

that the petitioner has complied with the condition from 17.04.2019 onwards without any deviation.

¶21

5.Considering the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel on either side, this petition is allowed and the condition imposed on the petitioner is relaxed. However, the petitioner shall report before the respondent as and when required for interrogation.

¶22

Sd/03/06/2019 / TRUE COPY /

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶24

¶25

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO V MADURAI

¶26

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI

¶27

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE S.S.COLONY POLICE STATION,

¶28

MADURAI CITY

¶29

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶30

+1 CC TO Mr.A.S.Vaigunth, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 9140

¶31

ORDER

¶32

IN CRL MP(MD) No.4396 of 2019 in

¶33

CRL OP(MD) No.3132 of 2019 DATE : 03/06/2019 LS PK/PN/SAR-1/07.06.2019 : 2P/6C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Shankar @ Shankaranarayanan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shankar @ Shankaranarayanan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sathish, S/O.Rasu, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Akkeesh, Vs the Inspector of Police

Murugan Vs the Inspector of Police

Stephanraj, S/O.Sivakumar, Vs the Inspector of Police

G.Balamurugan, Vs the Inspector of Police(Crime)

Kathiravan Vs the Inspector of Police