Allowed

Balamurugan, S/O.Sethu v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC29 Apr 2019CRL MP(MD)/4013/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition to relax bail conditions imposed in a separate order. Court allowed relaxation subject to reporting to police for interrogation as investigations remain pending.

What did the court decide?

The condition imposed in Crl.OP.(MD)No.3921 of 2019 on 15.03.2019 is relaxed. The petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

Balamurugan, S/O.Sethu Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Twenty Ninth day of April Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRL MP(MD) No.4013 of 2019 IN CRL OP(MD) No.3921 of 2019

¶7

BALAMURUGAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1

¶8

¶9

THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DEVIPATTINAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

¶10

Crime No.35 of 2019 ... RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.OP(MD)No.3921 of 2019 dated 15.03.2019 on the file of this Hon'ble Court.

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.T.VEERAKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶13

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.OP.(MD)No.3921 of 2019 on 15.03.2019.

¶14

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this court in Crl.OP.(MD)No.3921 of 2019 on 15.03.2019 regularly and he prayed for relaxation of the said condition.

¶15

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ investigation is still pending.

¶16

¶17

4.Taking into consideration of the submissions made by both the counsels, the condition imposed by this court in Crl.OP.(MD)No.3921 of 2019 on 15.03.2019, is relaxed and the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, as and when required for interrogation. sd/29/04/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO I, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DEVIPATTINAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.4013 of 2019 IN CRL OP(MD) No.3921 of 2019 Date :29/04/2019 TK/PN/SAR-1/06.05.2019/2P/5C

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Balamurugan, S/O.Sethu v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Balamurugan, S/O.Sethu v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kayalvizhi, Vs the Inspector of Police

Selvam @ Ramar Selvam, Vs the Inspector of Police

Saravanan Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

T. Santhanam, S/O.Thangarasu Vs the Inspector of Police

Ganesan, Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Sekar @ Chandrasekar, Vs the Inspector of Police