Karthika v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
The criminal miscellaneous petition seeking condonation of absence was dismissed as withdrawn at the petitioner's request upon hearing counsel arguments.
The criminal miscellaneous petition seeking condonation of absence was dismissed as withdrawn at the petitioner's request upon hearing counsel arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Seventeenth day of June Two Thousand Nineteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.7491 OF 2019
IN CRL.A.NO.35 OF 2014
KARTHIKA [ PETITIONER / APPELLANT / ACCUSED ]
Vs
STATE BY: [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, CBI/ACB,
CHENNAI
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to condone the absence of the petitioner on 01.07.2019 condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.843/2017 in C.A.No.35 of 2017 against C.C.NO.14/2007 on the file of the learned XI Additional Special Sessions Judge (CBI cases relating to Banks and Financial Institutions), Chennai dated 19/01/2017
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.K.R.RAMESH KUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.SRINIVASAN SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR CBI CASES on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this miscellaneous petition and has also made an endorsement in the petition to that effect.
2 In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this miscellaneous petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE XI ADDITIONAL SPECIAL JUDGE,
[CBI CASES RELATING TO BANKS AND
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS], CHENNAI.
2 THE SPECIAL PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR FOR CBI CASES,
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
3 THE XI ADDITIONAL SPECIAL
JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, CHENNAI.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,
CBI/ACB, CHENNAI
C.C. to M/S.K.R.RAMESH KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
Order
in
CRL MP.7491/2019
in
CRL.A.35/2017
Date :17/06/2019
From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified
copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format
MK:20/06/2019
KARTHIKA
THE STATE
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court