M.Haridoss v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
This court granted a petition for suspension of sentence. Rebuked the suppression of prior complaints and trap proceedings by the prosecution. Ordered the substantive sentence of imprisonment to be suspended till the disposal of the appeal and allowed the petitioner bail on bond.
What did the court decide?
Substantive sentence of imprisonment suspended pending disposal of appeal; petitioner enlarged on bail on bond.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Crl.MP.No.4776 of 2019 in Crl. A.No.189 of 2019
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.,
The petition has been filed to suspend the sentence of
imprisonment imposed in the judgment dated 21.03.2019 made in Special Case. No.27 of 2014 on the file of the learned Special Judge, Special Court for Prevention of Corruption Act cases at Villupuram pending disposal of the appeal.
- The petitioner/appellant herein is the accused in
Special Case.No.27 of 2014 on the file of the learned Special Judge, Special Court for Prevention of Corruption Act cases at Villupuram. He
was found guilty of the offences u/s. 7, 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act and he has been convicted and sentenced as under:
| S.No. | Conviction | Sentence | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Section 7 of P.C Act 1988. |
4 years R. in default months. |
I and fine of Rs.1,000/- to undergo S.I for 3 |
| 2. | 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of P.C Act. |
5 years R. in default months. |
I and fine of Rs.5,000/- to undergo S.I for 6 |
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed in the conviction and sentencing judgment should be suspended pending the disposal of the appeal.
Whether bail should be granted to the appellant during the pendency of the appeal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Haridoss
- respondent
State
Coram
A.D.Jagadish Chandira
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court