Allowed

Jayaseelan v. the Executive Magistrate Cum

Madras HC2 Jan 2019CRL MP/17919/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an interim bail application, the Single Judge of Madras High Court suspended the substantive sentence of imprisonment and granted bail to the petitioner, subject to exoring a bond and appearing before the police monthly.

What did the court decide?

The substantive sentence of imprisonment was suspended, and the petitioner was released on bail on condition of executing a bond with two sureties and appearing before the respondent police monthly.

Jayaseelan Vs the Executive Magistrate Cum — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Second day of January Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. PARTHIBAN CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.17919 of 2018

¶6

CRL.RC.NO.1528/2018

¶7

JAYASEELAN [ PETITIONER ] Vs 1 THE EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE CUM [ RESPONDENTS ] DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, WASHERMENPET DISTRICT.

¶8

2 STATE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, (CRIME), N2 KASIMEDU POLICE STATION, CHENNAI-600 013.

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the Memorandum of Grounds in Criminal RC.No.1528 OF 2018 on the file of the High Court, the High Court will be pleased to SUSPEND THE SENTENCE and enlarge the petitioner on bail in MP.No.1 of 2018 in RC.No.62/Sec.Pro/DCP WPT/2018 on the file of the 1st respondent pending disposal of the CRL.RC.NO.1528/2018.

¶10

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the Memorandum of Grounds in Crl.RC.No.1528 of 2018 on the file of the High Court and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.E.JAI SHANKAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶11

This miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner by order dated 10.09.2018 in M.P.No.1 of 2018 in R.C.No.62/Sec.Pro/DCP WPT/2018 by the learned Executive Magistrate cum Deputy Commissioner of Police, Washermenpet District, and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above criminal revision.

¶12

Heard both sides.

¶13

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this miscellaneous petition is allowed and the substantive sentence of imprisonment alone is suspended and the petitioner is released on bail on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for

¶14

a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned XVI Metropolitan Magistrate Court, George Town. Further, the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police on the first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m until further orders.

¶15

-sd/02/01/2019

¶16

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶17

TRUE COPY

¶18

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO 1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, NO.XVI, GEORGE TOWN, CHENNAI. 2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PUZHAL. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS. 5 THE EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE CUM DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, WASHERMENPET DISTRICT. 6 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, (CRIME), N2 KASIMEDU POLICE STATION, CHENNAI-600 013. C.C. to M/S.E.JAI SHANKAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges Order in CRL MP.17919/2018

¶19

CRL.RC.NO.1528/2018

¶20

Date :02/01/2019

¶21

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format ths : 03.01.2019

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Jayaseelan v. the Executive Magistrate Cum

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jayaseelan v. the Executive Magistrate Cum

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Jayachandran, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Selvi Vs State Represented by

R.Sathyanathan Vs P.Pushpanathan

J.Subitha, Vs S.a.Raman Ias.

T. Amudha, Vs K.Kolandaswamy

Dinesh Vs State