Dismissed

Nitesh Jain Mangal Chand v. the Senior Intelligence Officer

Madras HC27 Nov 2019CRL MP/16753/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court relaxed the reporting condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.MP.No.8353/2019. The original requirement to report on 1st and 15th of every month was modified to report only once a month at 10:30 a.m.

What did the court decide?

The condition imposed is modified to require the petitioner to report before the respondent police monthly once at 10.30 a.m.

Nitesh Jain Mangal Chand Vs the Senior Intelligence Officer — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Twenty Seventh day of November Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice C.V. KARTHIKEYAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.16753 of 2019

¶7

IN CRL OP.8528/2019

¶8

NITESH JAIN MANGAL CHAND [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs

¶9

THE SENIOR INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, [ RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT ] DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX INTELLIGENCE, CHENNAI ZONAL UNIT, C-3, C-WING, RAJAJI BHAWAN, BESANT NAGAR, CHENNAI-600 090. RR.NO.6/2019

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed that the petitioner is directed to report before the respondent on 1st and 15th day of every month at 10.30 a.m., until further orders in Crl.MP.No.8353/2019 in Crl.OP.No.8528/2019 dated 29/07/2019.

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. K.SENGUTTUVAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.N.P.KUMAR, SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR GST CASES on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶12

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner by an order dated 29.07.2019 in Crl.M.P.No.8353 of 2019 in Crl.O.P.No.8528 of 2019 to appear before respondent police on 1st and 15th day of every month at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶13

2.Heard both sides.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

3.Considering the submission, the condition imposed as against the petitioner is modified to the effect that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police monthly once at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

¶16

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶17

TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
E.O.II, EGMORE, CHENNAI.
2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
EGMORE, CHENNAI [FOR INFORMATION]
3 THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
FOR GST CASES, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE SENIOR INTELLIGENCE OFFICER,
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GOODS AND
SERVICES TAX INTELLIGENCE,
CHENNAI ZONAL UNIT,
C-3, C-WING, RAJAJI BHAWAN,
BESANT NAGAR, CHENNAI - 600 090.

¶18

+1 C.C. to M/S. K.SENGUTTUVAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.24763

¶19

Order
in
CRL MP.16753/2019
in
CRL OP.8528/2019
Date :27/11/2019

¶20

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ cs 04/12/2019

Nitesh Jain Mangal Chand v. the Senior Intelligence Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nitesh Jain Mangal Chand v. the Senior Intelligence Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Premanand Vs Nemichand Bhati

S.Devi Vs the State Rep. by

Maheshwari Vs State by

Thiyagarajan Vs the State Rep by

S.Selvakumar Vs State by Station House Officer

Dr.P.Senthilmurugan Vs the Deputy Superintendent of Police