Dismissed

Arulkumar v. the State Rep by Its

Madras HC17 Oct 2019CRL MP/12974/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, the High Court of Madras refused to grant suspension of sentence to the petitioners. The court was not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail and dismissed the petition, directing the registry to post the revision for final disposal.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking suspension of sentence and enlargement on bail.

Arulkumar Vs the State Rep by Its — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Seventeenth day of October Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.12974 of 2019

¶7

IN CRL.R.C.NO.1062 of 2018
1 ARULKUMAR [ PETITIONERS ]
2 SHANMUGAM
3 VIJAYAKUMAR
4 VENKATESH
Vs
THE STATE REP BY ITS, [ RESPONDENT ]
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
MAGUDANCHAVADI POLICE STATION,
SALEM DISTRICT.
CR.NO.543 OF 2015.

¶8

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to

¶9

(i) To suspend the sentence of imposed in the Judgment dated 21.08.2018 made in C.A.No.67 of 2018 on the file of the learned III Additional Sessions Court, Salem confirming the judgment dated 21.03.2018 made in SC.NO.160 of 2017 on the file of the learned Assistant Sessions court, Sankari and enlarge the petitioners on bail pending disposal of the above Crl.R.C.No.1062 of 2018.

¶10

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S.N.ARUN KUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner, and of M/S.M.MOHAMED RIYAZ, Additional Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶11

After hearing the arguments advanced on either side, this Court is not inclined to grant suspension of sentence to the petitioner. Accordingly the petition stands dismissed.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

The Registry is directed to post the criminal revision, during the second week of November 2019, for final disposal.

¶14

-sd/-

¶15

17/10/2019

¶16

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶17

TRUE COPY

¶18

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT,
SANKARI.
2 THE III ADDITIONAL SESSIONS
COURT, SALEM.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
MAGUDANCHAVADI POLICE STATION,
SALEM DISTRICT.
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
5 THE SUPERINTENDENT,
CENTRAL PRISON, COIMBATORE.
6 THE SECTION OFFICER,
CRIMINAL SECTION,
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
+1 C.C. to M/S.S.N.ARUN KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary
charges SR.NO.21373
Order
in
CRL MP.12974/2019
in
CRL.R.C.NO.1062/2018
Date :17/10/2019
From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified
copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ TA-22/10/2019

Arulkumar v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arulkumar v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ilango,S/O. Athinamaligai, Vs K. Sinduja

D.Anitha, Aged 43 Years, Vs Ganthimathi

D.Anitha, Aged 43 Years, Vs S.Gopalan

Subbulakshmi Vs S. Jegathambal

Mr.v.Suresh Babu, Aged 44 Year Vs Mrs.Hemalatha

Sebastin Princess Vs M.Somasundaram