Dismissed

S.Jai Singh v. State Represented by

Madras HC17 Dec 2019CRL MP/12105/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought stay of criminal proceedings. The court dismissed the petition holding that the petitioner failed to comply with prior orders to deposit an amount of Rs.3.25 lakhs, having the draft returned by the Magistrate without permission.

What did the court decide?

Petition for stay of proceedings in C.C.No.5604 of 2019 dismissed due to non-compliance with earlier order to deposit amount.

S.Jai Singh Vs State Represented by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Seventeenth day of December Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P. RAJAMANICKAM

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.12105 of 2019

¶7

IN CRL OP.23120/2019

¶8

1 S.JAI SINGH [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 FA. ARUL 3 FA. JOSEPH FERNANDEZ

¶9

¶10

1 STATE REPRESENTED BY [ RESPONDENTS / COMPLAINANT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K-9, THIRU-VI-KA NAGAR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

¶11

2 R.MURALI

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the Memorandum of Grounds in Crl.OP.No.23120/2019 on the file of the High Court, the High Court will be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No.5604 of 2019 pending on the file of the learned V Metropolitan Magistrate at Egmore, pending disposal of the above Crl.OP.No.23120/2019.

¶13

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and Memorandum of Grounds in Crl.OP.No.23120/2019 of On the file of the High Court and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. P.K.GANESH, Advocate for the petitioner, and of Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on behalf of the 1^st Respondent and of NO APPEARANCE on behalf of the 2^nd Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶14

No representation for the second respondent.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per the order of this Court, the petitioner went to deposit the demand draft for a sum of Rs.3.25 lakhs before the learned V Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, on 11.12.2019, but the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, has returned the said demand draft stating that this Court has not directed the petitioner to deposit the said demand draft.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

It is seen from the order of this Court dated 11.12.2019, that this Court has directed the petitioner to deposit the amount of Rs.3.25 lakhs before the V Metropolitan Magistrate to the credit of C.C.No.5604 of 2019 but he has not been permitted to deposit the demand draft. The petitioner has not complied with the orders of this Court. Hence, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.

¶18

-sd/17/12/2019

¶19

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶20

TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO

¶21

1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE NO.V, EGMORE.

¶22

2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI [FOR INFORMATION]

¶23

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶24

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K-9, THIRU-VI-KA NAGAR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

¶25

C.C. to M/S. P.K.GANESH Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶26

Order

¶27

in CRL MP.12105/2019 in CRL OP.23120/2019 Date :17/12/2019

¶28

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ cs 26/12/2019

S.Jai Singh v. State Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Jai Singh v. State Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Udhayakumar, Vs Dhandapani(Deceased)

B.Periasamy, Aged 37 Years, Vs Revathi, Aged 25 Years

Murugan Vs Isakkiammal @ Indu

L.Rani Vs the Superintendent of Police

B.Pattammal Vs Selvi

K.M.Vishnu Priya Vs the Commissioner of Police