Disposed

Amani Praveen Kumar v. State by Inspector of Police

Madras HC20 Aug 2019CRL MP/11302/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking relaxation of daily police reporting conditions. Court allowed the petition, modifying strict time-bound reporting to as-required appearance due to employment needs and settlement of the dispute.

What did the court decide?

Daily reporting condition relaxed; petitioner directed to appear before police as required for interrogation.

Amani Praveen Kumar Vs State by Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Twentieth day of August Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.11302 of 2019

¶7

IN CRL OP.12832/2019

¶8

AMANI PRAVEEN KUMAR [ PETITIONER ]

¶9

¶10

STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, [ RESPONDENT ] TEYNAMPET-CRIME, GREATER CHENNAI, (CR.NO.1083/2018).

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to relax the conditions imposed on the petitioner shall stay at Chennai and report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. and 5.30 p.m. until further orders in the above Crl.O.P.No.12832 of 2019 by order dated 24.07.2019

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.T.SAI KRISHNAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.PRABAKAR Additional public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶13

The above miscellaneous petition is filed seeking to relax the conditions imposed on the petitioner by this Court vide order dated 24.07.2019 made in Crl.MP.No.11302/2019 in Crl.OP.No.12832/2019.

¶14

2 This Court, in its order dated 24.07.2019, while suspending the sentence of the petitioner, had imposed a condition to the effect that the petitioner should report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am and 5.30 pm until further orders.

¶15

3 The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is working as Horticultural officer in the Horticultural Department in the Telangana State which requires his attendance. and that, the petitioner has been complying with the conditions imposed by this Court till now. He would further submit that the issue between the de facto complainant and the petitioner has been settled. Pursuant to the same, the de facto complainant has also agreed to withdraw the complaint against him. Hence, he would seek that the condition imposed on the petitioner be modified.

¶16

4 Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ for the State who would submit that the petitioner is complying the

¶17

condition imposed by this Court without any default.

¶18

5 In view of the above, the condition imposed vide order dated 24.07.2019, is hereby relaxed and the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

¶19

6 The petition is ordered accordingly.

¶20

-sd/-

¶21

20/08/2019

¶22

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶23

TRUE COPY

¶24

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO

¶25

1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, COURT NO.XVIII,SAIDAPET,CHENNAI

¶26

2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,EGMORE,CHENNAI[FOR INFORMATION]

¶27

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶28

4 STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TEYNAMPET-CRIME, GREATER CHENNAI,

¶29

C.C. to M/S.T.SAI KRISHNAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges

Order

in CRL MP.11302/2019

in CRL OP.12832/2019

Date :20/08/2019

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format RD 27/08/2019

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Amani Praveen Kumar v. State by Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amani Praveen Kumar v. State by Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishnakumar Vs The Deputy Superintendent of police

Mrs.v.K.Subramaniam & Brothers Vs M.S.Natarajan Proprietor

M/S.v.P.K.Textiles Vs M.S.Natarajan Prop.

S.K.Sundaram Vs State Represented by

J. Jeyaprathap Singh, Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

A.Aandi, 35 Years, Vs a.Chandra 30 Years