S.Murthi v. P.Thulasi
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking to condone a 408-day delay in filing a revision petition. The court found no valid reason stated for the delay.
What did the court decide?
The criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed.
What the court decided
Crl.MP.No.11095 of 2019 in Crl.RC.SR.No.34714 of 2019
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.,
The criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed, seeking to condone the delay of 408 days in filing the above Criminal Revision in Crl.RC.SR.No.34714
of 2019, against the order dated 10.01.2018, made in M.C.No.407/2012, made by the learned VII Additional Family Judge,Chennai.
2 Heard both sides.
3 Though the detailed affidavit has been filed on facts, no valid reason has been stated by the petitioner, seeking to condone the delay of 408 days in filing
the revision for condone the delay.
4 In view of the above Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.
01.10.2019
ssi
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
whether the delay of 408 days in filing the criminal revision petition can be condoned due to lack of valid reasons.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
State of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
Coram
A.D. Jagadish Chandira
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court