The High Court dismissed a Criminal Appeal filed by the complainant seeking to set aside an acquittal of respondents in an IPC offenses trial, as the appellant failed to appear or file any representation.
Dismissal of the Criminal Appeal for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.06.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.A.No.522 of 2010
Mrs.Jayalakshmi ... Appellant/Complainant
//vs//
PRAYER: Criminal Appeal filed under section 378 of Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records pertaining to the judgement dated 16.06.2010 in C.C.No.6709 of 2008 on the file of the learned XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015 and set-aside the order of acquittal passed against the respondents 1 to 3.
For Appellant : No appearance J U D G E M E N T
This Criminal Appeal has been filed against the dismissal of the private complaint in C.C.No.6709 of 2008 on the file of the learned XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai, dated 16.06.2010 for the offences under Sections 448 and 506(2) IPC. This appeal has been filed in the year 2010.
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kv
To
Crl.A.No.522 of 2010
CSL/05.07.2019
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal Appeal filed under section 378 Cr.P.C. should be allowed or dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of the appellant?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mrs. Jayalakshmi
Abdul Razack
S.R. Sadhakarthulla
A. Shafek Mohideen
A.D. Jagadish Chandira
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
