The High Court held that since the appellant had completed his sentence and was released from jail, the criminal appeal filed under Section 374(2) CrPC stands closed as infructuous.
The criminal appeal stands closed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01.11.2019 CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.A.No.103 of 2018
Mani @ Manikandan ... Appellant Vs.
State rep by The Inspector of Police, B9, Saravanampatti Police Station (Crime) Coimbatore City.
... Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment made in SC.No.145 of 2012 dated 18.12.2017 on the file of IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Muruganantham
For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced a communication letter from the respondent police stating that the accused has already completed the period of sentence and taking into consideration the period he was remanded in judicial custody from 29.12.2011 to 30.09.2013 and also taking into consideration the G.o.No.1171/Home/4/Jail dated 01.10.2019, the appellant has been released from jail.
Sub Assistant Registrar dpq To
B9, Saravanampatti Police Station,Coimbatore City.
Crl.A.No.103 of 2018
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ A.SK(13/12/2019)
Mani @ Manikandan
State
A.D. Jagadish Chandira
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
