Petitioners filed contempt petitions under Section 11 alleging wilful disobedience of the Court's order in Writ Appeals No.1624 to 1627 of 2016. Respondent Counsel raised compliance; Court recorded satisfaction and closed contempt petitions.
Contempt petitions closed on record of satisfaction regarding compliance with previous orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD) Nos.1451 to 1454 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 25.10.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM and
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI
Cont.P.(MD) Nos.1451 to 1454 of 2019 in W.A.(MD) Nos.1624 to 1627 of 2016
V.Jeyabalan ... Petitioner in Cont.P.(MD) No.1451/2019 C.Mathivanan ... Petitioner in Cont.P.(MD) No.1452/2019 S.Kingston Kanagaraj ... Petitioner in Cont.P.(MD) No.1453/2019 D.Kulandaivelu ... Petitioner in Cont.P.(MD) No.1454/2019
-vs-
M.A.Murugesan, The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited, Bye Pass Road, Madurai – 625 010. ... Contemnor / Appellant
PRAYER: Contempt Petitions filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying to punish the respondent for having wilfully and deliberately disobeyed the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.A.(MD) Nos.1624 to 1627 of 2016 dated 01.09.2017 for having committed Contempt of Court.
WA(MD).1624 to 1627 of 2016:
Writ Appeals are filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent, to set aside the order dated 27/03/2014 passed in W.P(MD) Nos.1137,972,971 and 1127 of 2013 respectively on the file of this Court.
Prayer in WP(MD). 1137, 972, 971 & 1127 of 2013 :
Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, in the nature of writ, directing the respondent to pay a sum of Rs.59,888/-,Rs.1,42,680/-,Rs.84,904/- and Rs.57,473/- being the difference amount of encashment of earned leave between the encashment of earned leave paid based on the pre revised scale and encashment of earned leave payable based on the revised scale along with 18% interest to the petitioner and to pass such other or further orders. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
1/2
Cont.P.(MD) Nos.1451 to 1454 of 2019
For Petitioner in all the petitions: Ms.D.Ramya For Respondent in all the petitions: Mr.J.Senthil Kumariah Standing Counsel O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.]
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in these Contempt Petitions submitted that the order and direction issued by this Court in W.A.(MD) Nos.1624 to 1627 of 2016, dated 01.09.2017, have been complied with. Recording the same, these Contempt Petitions are closed.
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
sj
To
The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited, Bye Pass Road, Madurai – 625 010.
+4CC TO MR.J.SENTHIL KUMARIAH, Advocate Sr. No.94832 TO 94835
Cont.P.(MD) Nos.1451 to 1454 of 2019 25.10.2019
NA(CO) TR(18.11.2019)2P 6C
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioner has successfully proved wilful disobedience of this Court's earlier order regarding earned leave encashment difference payments.
V.Jeyabalan, C.Mathivanan, S.Kingston Kanagaraj, D.Kulandaivelu
T.S.SIVAGNANAM
R.THARANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
