A.Balaji v. Senthil Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
This is an order closing a contempt petition where the respondent explained that encroachments were removed and valid ones were advised to regularize. The court recorded the explanation and disposed of the petition without further adjudication.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed after the respondent explained compliance with the prior order regarding encroachments.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT.P.NO.963/2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 18.12.2019
CORAM
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN
AND
HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA
Cont.P.No.963 of 2019
A.Balaji .. Petitioner
Vs.
Senthil Kumar,
Tahsildar,
Taluk Office,
Veppur, Cuddalore District. .. Respondent
* *
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the
respondent for is willful disobedience in not complying
with the order of this Court dated 02.04.2018 in
W.P.No.7521/2018.
* *
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Saravanan
For Respondent : Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali,
Government Advocate
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J.)
The petitioner, alleging non-compliance and willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 02.04.218 in W.P.No.7521 of 2018, has filed this contempt petition.
1/3
CONT.P.NO.963/2019
petitioner and Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali, learned Government Advocate, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondent/Contemnor.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition regarding non-compliance with an earlier order stands closed given the explanation filed.
Whether further adjudication in the contempt petition remains necessary.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A. Balaji
- respondent
Senthil Kumar, Tahsildar
Coram
M. Sathyanarayanan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court