K.Sampath v. State by Mr.Shankar
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, filed against the DySP for disobeying an earlier order, was closed. The respondent submitted that the enquiry into the petitioner's complaint concluded on 02.01.2019, and the court granted liberty to challenge the closure report.
What did the court decide?
The Contempt Petition is closed with liberty to challenge the closure report.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.08.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH
Cont.P.No.960 of 2019
K.Sampath ... Petitioner Vs. State by: Mr.Shankar Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Tiruvarur, Tiruvarur District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of the Courts Act praying to punish the respondent for the contempt committed by him in willfully disobeying the order dated 21.02.2018 passed in M.P.No.1 of 2015 in Crl.O.P.No.28844 of 2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.Manoj Sreevalsan
For Respondent : Mr.B.Arulmozhi Maran Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER Heard Mr.Manoj Sreevalsan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.B.Arulmozhi Maran, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Sampath
- respondent
State
Coram
M.S.RAMESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court