Balasubramanian v. A.V.S Ganesan
Case brief
What is this about?
This order reports that the respondents complied with an earlier order regarding possession of property. The High Court consequently closed the contempt petition and sub-applications.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition and sub-applications closed due to compliance.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.02.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
Cont.P.No.72 of 2019
and
Sub Application Nos.29 and 30 of 2019
Cont.P.No.72 of 2019:
A.V.S.Balasubramanian ... Petitioner in Cont.P.No.72 of 2019
-vs-
1.A.V.S.Ganesan
2.M.Manimaran ... Respondents in Cont.P.No.72 of 2019
Sub Application No.29 of 2019:
A.V.S.Balasubramanian ... Petitioner in Sub Application No.29
of 2019
-vs-
1.A.V.S.Ganesan
2.M.Manimaran ... Respondents in Sub Application No.29
of 2019
2
Sub Application No.30 of 2019:
A.V.S.Balasubramanian ... Petitioner in Sub Application No.30 of 2019
-vs-
1.A.V.S.Ganesan
2.M.Manimaran ... Respondents in Sub Application No.30
of 2019
Prayer in Cont.P.No.72 of 2019: Contempt Petition filed under Section
11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for the
contempt of Court committed by them by violating the Order dated
12.10.2018 passed by this Hon'ble Court in C.R.P.(PD).No.2401 of
2010.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.V.S. Balasubramanian
- respondent
A.V.S. Ganesan
- respondent
M. Manimaran
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court